Categories: News

CJ KOOME’S RULES ON HEARING OF PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS PETITION THROWN OUT

The High Court has outlawed the Supreme Court’s decision to prevent lawyers, petitioners and respondents of a presidential election petition from making public comments about the case.

Justice Mugure Thande on Wednesday said that the Supreme Court (Presidential Election Petition Amendment Rules) 2022 did not have public participation.

Chief Justice Martha Koome’s request for a stay of execution of the Judgment pending the filing of an appeal has also been declined.

The rules had been introduced by CJ Koome to gag lawyers and litigants involved in any presidential election petition.

The amendments were published in the Kenya Gazette months before the General Election.

“Upon commencement of the hearing of the petition by the court, litigants, their advocates and advocates’ agents shall refrain from expressing their opinion on merit, demerit or predict the outcome of the petition in any manner that would prejudice or impede court proceedings, until judgment is delivered,” the amended rules stated.

Many lawyers expressed displeasure with the new rules, with the Law Society of Kenya describing them as “drastic, unjustifiable and ambiguous”.

“We are writing a letter to CJ asking her to recall the amendment with immediate effect to allow for public participation. She should have presented the rules to LSK and other stakeholders to look at them and make comments before they were gazetted,” said LSK president Eric Theuri.

Advocates argued that the new rules were against the freedom of expression as stipulated in the Constitution.

They defended that discussions or remarks made by advocates cannot affect the judgement of a court.

“The amendment, though intended to protect the integrity of the proceedings before the Supreme Court, is something that cannot be supported in a democratic society that cherishes the constitutional rights and freedom of expression,” Theuri said.

The rule seems to have emanated from the hearing of the BBI case, in which CJ Martha Koome reprimanded top lawyers for their public comments on the case.

via WordPress https://bit.ly/3zZM0xj

admin

Share
Published by
admin
Tags: Cross Post

Recent Posts

Ways to Solve IPVanish Problems

ipvanish is among the best VPN services on the globe. It offers a big network…

11 months ago

Treasury Cabinet Secretary Njuguna Ndungu Presents FY2023/24 Budget Statement: Key Highlights and Fiscal Priorities Unveiled

In a significant development for Kenya’s economic landscape, Treasury Cabinet Secretary Njuguna Ndung’u presented the…

11 months ago

Amina Kenyan Wife of Ali Kiba Declares Intent for Divorce Citing Fatigue from Sustained Disrespect

Amina, the wife of renowned Tanzanian musician Ali Kiba, has taken a bold step by…

11 months ago

Unveiling a Disturbing Pattern: Another Woman Accuses KRG The Don of Neglecting Their 9-Month-Old Daughter

A fresh wave of controversy has emerged as yet another woman steps forward, leveling accusations…

11 months ago

Financial Security and Family: Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodriguezs Remarkable Prenuptial Agreement

The details of the highly anticipated prenuptial agreement between renowned footballer Cristiano Ronaldo and his…

11 months ago

Boxer Congestina Achieng new look after rehab now acts as Mike Sonko Personal Bodyguard

In a truly awe-inspiring turn of events, renowned Kenyan boxer Congestina Achieng has emerged from…

11 months ago